Legal Opinion
Midwood Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided May 27, 1970No. C.D. 4026; Protest 68/44059-26779-68, etcPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Judge:
The merchandise of these protests, consolidated for trial, consists of steel forgings exported from West Germany, England, and Italy, and entered at the port of New York. Delivery of the merchandise to the plaintiff-importer was refused by the regional commissioner of customs upon entry in accordance with provisions of 19 U.S.C.A., section 1304 (a) relating to markings as to country of origin on the merchandise. Plaintiff protests against the action of the regional commissioner of customs herein, contending :
We contend that said merchandise is clearly and properly marked…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Steiner v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Watson Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Juice Products Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- The Torrington Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Ferrostaal Metals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Superior Wire, a Div. of Superior Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- CPC International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.