Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. J. G. Menihan Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is before .us upon a record made tip pursuant to Rule 76 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The question presented is whether the trial court erred in dismissing *941the complaint without costs and in denying the defendants’ application for an additional allowance on the theory, stated in the court’s opinion, D. C., 29 F.Supp. 853, that no provision of law permits the imposition of costs against the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
In equity and in admiralty the imposition of costs is so largely a matter within the discretion of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Puget Sound Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Harris v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Sherwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Time, Inc. v. T.I.M.E. Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.