Legal Opinion
Pinkham v. Morrill
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 16, 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLINS, Justice.
New Hampshire Insurance Company (NHIC), proceeding in the name of Katherine C. Pinkham, its insured, pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 17(c), 1 appeals from the decision of the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Kravchuk, J.) granting a summary judgment in favor of the defendants Daniel W. Morrill and Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company (B & A). The Superior Court, in granting the defendants’ motion for a summary judgment pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 56(c), 2 concluded that the Maine Insurance Guaranty Association Act, 24-A M.R.S.A. §§ 4431-4452 (1990 & Supp.1991) (the Act), barred NHIC’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Emery Waterhouse Co. v. LeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Penobscot Nation v. StilphenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Rubin v. JosephsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Butler v. KilloranSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Town of Madison, Department of Electric Works v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Davis v. SBA TOWERS II, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Wilson v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.