Legal Opinion

Neada v. State Farm Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1949No. Docket No. 58, Calendar No. 44,254PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

In this case the trial court, on motion, rendered judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant. Motion to vacate said judgment was denied, and plaintiff has appealed. No proofs were submitted on the hearing of the motion. The questions at issue must be determined on the material averments of'fact set forth in the pleadings.

The declaration alleged that on July 21, 1943, the defendant executed a life insurance policy in the sum of $2,000, the insured being Laura Neada, wife of the plaintiff who was the beneficiary named in said policy. Mrs. Neada died on December 19, 1943. Defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. DaleOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Plec v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Crouse v. DerbyshireMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Zdero v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. Regents of Univ. of Mich.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Frischman v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Frischman v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API