Legal Opinion
Cerino v. Kaduk
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County
Decided November 13, 2000No. 1998-C-1835PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREEDBERG, P.J.,
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ objections to defendants’ bill of costs and plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions. Defendants have responded by requesting that they be awarded attorney’s fees. A conference was held on July 14, 2000, and letter briefs were subsequently filed by both parties. For the reasons stated in the following opinion, plaintiffs’ objections will be granted and both requests for attorney’s fees will be denied.
BACKGROUND
This dispute arises from a jury trial before the Honorable Robert E. Simpson Jr., in June 2000. Prior to the trial, the parties…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- McDonnell v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Century Inn, Inc. v. Century Inn Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- PMA Insurance Group v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Power v. TomarchioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thompson v. T.J. Whipple Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Vargo v. MangusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004