Glosser v. City of New Haven
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivan, J.
The plaintiffs (appellants) filed their complaint in the trial court “. . . to enjoin ultra vires action by the city of New Haven and its Mayor and its Common Council, to set aside certain sewage ordinances as capricious, discriminatory and void.” The trial court held the action to be a public lawsuit as defined in Indiana Acts of 1965, Chapter 357, Burns Ind. Stat., 1968 Repl., § 3-3301 et seq. The trial court then on partial summary judgment held two of the three questioned ordinances valid. Trial was had on the question of the validity of the third ordinance. After hearing the evidence,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Realty, Inc. v. Hillman's Equipment, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Gariup v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Schill v. ChoateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Papp v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
- Kapusta v. DePuy Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Reichhart v. City of New HavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Nelson v. DenkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Cordial v. GrimmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Vanco v. Sportsmax, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Raper v. Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.