United States National Bank of Omaha v. Westervelt
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from tire district court of Hall county. Tried below before Kendall, J. The opinion contains a statement of the case. The deed conveying the premises to Mr. Hagge is absolutely void as to the creditors of the grantor, for the reason, apparent in the defeasance, that the instrument was made for the benefit of the grantor and to hinder and delay his creditors in the collection of their debts.
Read the full summary
Error from tire district court of Hall county. Tried below before Kendall, J. The opinion contains a statement of the case. The deed conveying the premises to Mr. Hagge is absolutely void as to the creditors of the grantor, for the reason, apparent in the defeasance, that the instrument was made for the benefit of the grantor and to hinder and delay his creditors in the collection of their debts. (lÁver-more v. McNair, 34 N. J. Eq. 478; Grcmnis v. Smith, 22 Tenn. 179; Harman v. Hoskins, 56 Miss. 142; Richards v. Hamsard, 1 S. & P. [Ala.] 139; Harris v. Simmer, 2 Pick. [Mass.] 129; Given v.…
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
' Christian A. H. Von Wasmer was indebted to the Citizens National Bank of Grand Island on a number of notes made or indorsed by him, and on overdrafts, and on No*426vember 10,1893, executed to William A. Hagge, who was vice-president of that bank, a deed absolute in form conveying certain real estate in Grand Island. At tbe same time there was executed by both Hagge and Yon Wasmer a defeasance as follows: “Whereas Christian A. H. Von Wasmer and wife Emma have this day conveyed to William A. Hagge, by their deed in writing, all the following-described real estate [describing it], for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First National Bank of Abilene v. NaillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Freeman v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dauzat v. Simmesport State BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Jackson v. First National Bank of El CentroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927