Legal Opinion

Lichtman v. Knouf

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1994No. Record 931464PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

In this appeal, we consider whether an employee’s motion for judgment against her former employer and fellow employees claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress is barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act, Code §§ 65.2-100 through -1310 (the Act).

Helene Lichtman began her employment with United Services Automobile Association (USAA) in 1989. In her motion for judgment she alleged that beginning in 1991 she became the victim of systematic harassment by her fellow employees, Judi Knouf and Jack Wolcott. The harassment included undocumented complaints, damaging criticisms, defamatory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haddon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Merillat Industries, Inc. v. ParksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  3. Middlekauff v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Green v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Nunnally v. ArtisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  3. Padilla v. DinerVirginia Beach County Circuit Court · 2003
  4. Wood v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 2003
  5. Abney v. WimerVirginia Circuit Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API