Legal Opinion

Hobley v. Burge

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 17, 2004No. 03 C 3678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Non-parties John Conroy (“Conroy”) and Chicago Reader, Inc. (“Chicago Reader”) (collectively, the “Movants”) filed a motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum served upon *500them by defendants Jon Burge, Robert Dwyer, James Lotito, Virgil Mikus, Daniel McWeeny, John Paladino and Patrick Garrity (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”) and for the entry of a protective order. [Dkt 150.]1 That motion was referred to this court by the District Judge. [Dkt 151.] For the following reasons, the motion filed by Conroy and Chicago…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Albert Gonzales and Mary Gonzales, Deputy Darrell Pierce v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Gulliver's Periodicals, Ltd. v. Chas. Levy Circulating Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  5. Michael McKevitt v. Abdon PallaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mosely v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  2. Thayer v. ChiczewskiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. People v. DixonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  4. People v. DixonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API