Hobley v. Burge
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Non-parties John Conroy (“Conroy”) and Chicago Reader, Inc. (“Chicago Reader”) (collectively, the “Movants”) filed a motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum served upon *500them by defendants Jon Burge, Robert Dwyer, James Lotito, Virgil Mikus, Daniel McWeeny, John Paladino and Patrick Garrity (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”) and for the entry of a protective order. [Dkt 150.]1 That motion was referred to this court by the District Judge. [Dkt 151.] For the following reasons, the motion filed by Conroy and Chicago…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Albert Gonzales and Mary Gonzales, Deputy Darrell Pierce v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Gulliver's Periodicals, Ltd. v. Chas. Levy Circulating Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Michael McKevitt v. Abdon PallaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mosely v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Thayer v. ChiczewskiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- People v. DixonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- People v. DixonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021