Harriman v. Southam
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Henry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Harriman sued Southam to recover a tract of Tand. Harrimam owned the land in question in 1851, and conveyed it to the Fort Wayne and Soitthern Railroad Company for stock. A judgment was obtained against the company, the land sold on execution by virtue of it, and Southani became the purchaser.
According to the,answer, there never was a corporation in this Strife by the name of the '■'•Fort Wayne and Southern Railroad Company,” acting under color of authority. The State v. Dawson et al., at this term.
Hence, there was no grantee to receive the title attempted to be conveyed by Harriman. “A title…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. Cincinnati Type Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by19 opinions
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Duffield v. DuffieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Douthitt v. StinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Imperial Building Co. v. Chicago Open Board of TradeIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Jones v. Alpine Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.