Legal Opinion
Maya Realty Associates v. Holland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 13, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated May 10, 1995, as directed the petitioner to reduce its rental charges by 6.6% to reflect the elimination of certain "electrical inclusion allowances”, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), dated December 8, 1995, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The administrative proceedings underlying this appeal, though protracted in nature, may be pared to the following…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- MATTER OF AMSTERDAM-MANHATTAN ASSOCS. v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hyde Park Gardens v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Stein v. Rent Guidelines BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Matter of Tenants of Hyde Park Gardens v. State of New York, Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal, Office of Rent Admin.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Taleff Realty Corp. v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- Car Barn Flats Residents' Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 2000