Hackney v. Fetsch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action, in the district court for Bamsey county to recover $100 and to restrain defendant and his employees from entering certain premises or interfering in the occupancy thereof by plaintiff and his employees. From an order, Kelly, J., overruling his demurrer to the first counterclaim in defendant’s answer, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order overruling his separate demurrer to a counterclaim pleaded in the answer.
The complaint alleged that plaintiff was the owner of the Brokerage Building in St. Paul; that defendant for more than a year past and up to February 8, 1913, occupied a room in the building for the purposes of a retail cigar store under a written lease; that by the terms of this lease defendant agreed to maintain said cigar store in said room until February 28, 1913; that on February 8 defendant abandoned the room and removed therefrom his fixtures and stock; that on February…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hurley v. LamoreauxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Crosby v. Horne & Danz Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Blue Earth Valley Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Hayes v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Griffith v. DowdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916