Legal Opinion

Brantley v. Merchants & Farmers Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1918No. 9534PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint; from Campbell superior court—Judge Smith. December 1, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

The defendant in this case entered'^a plea setting up an original total lack of consideration, and also offered as an amendment thereto the defense that the note had never been delivered to the payee, but that, after having been entrusted by the maker into the hands of the payee, to be held by him as the property of the maker pending certain negotiations, it was fraudulently converted by the payee, and by him illegally indorsed, and thus came into the hands of the holder, who is the plaintiff in the suit. It is not the contention of the defendant that if the plaintiff be in fact an innocent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. Johnson County Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Matthews v. PoythressSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  3. Harrell v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Fidelity Trust Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Merchants' & Planters' National Bank v. Trustees of the Masonic HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alliance Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. Chatham Motor Co. v. Lincoln Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Evans v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Hale v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Traders Securities Co. v. Canton Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API