Legal Opinion

Garanflo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1917No. Nos. 4777, 4778PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas; F. A. Youmans, Judge. Criminal prosecution against William H. Garanflo and Robert D. Duncan. Judgment of conviction, and defendants severally bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were jointly indicted in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. There were six counts in the indictment. The first five charged each of the defendants with the willful misapplication of the money, funds, and credits of the State National Bank of Little Rock, in violation of Revised Statutes, § 5209 (U. S. Compiled Statutes 1916, § 9772). The sixth, count charged them with conspiring to misapply the money, funds, and credits of the said State National Bank under Criminal Code, § 37 (U. S. Compiled Statutes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Samuels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Withaup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Schultz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thayer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Sears v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
  3. Barshop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Helmerich & Payne v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  5. Barshop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API