Legal Opinion

Chandler v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 17, 1992No. A-3369PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

Thomas H. Chandler pled no contest to a charge of possessing cocaine (misconduct involving a controlled substance in the third degree), reserving his right to appeal the superior court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence, in which Chandler argued that the evidence against him resulted from an unlawful search and seizure. Chandler now appeals. We reverse.

On September 30, 1988, Carl Ekman, a special agent for the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), was in Ketchi-kan conducting an airport interdiction seminar for the Ketchikan Police Department. As part of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015
  2. Nease v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  3. Yi v. YangAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Saucier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1994
  5. Jarnig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API