Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Lane

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County

Decided March 10, 1975No. 475Published

1Opinion of the Court

BLAKEY, J.,

This matter is before the court en banc on plaintiffs motion for judgment for want of sufficient defense. The defense at issue is stated in defendants’ answer to plaintiffs praecipe to revive the lien of a judgment. Said judgment was confessed by plaintiff and entered by the prothonotary on January 31,1969. The praecipe for writ of revival was issued September 26, 1974.

*100Defendants appear to agree that their answer would not be sufficient under the law of this Commonwealth aside from possible implications of Swarb v. Lennox, 405 U.S. 191 (1972). The only defenses generally available…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cusano v. RubolinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API