R.S. v. State

QUINCE, Judge.

Counsel for appellant filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), which raised three possible issues. We find merit only in the arguments that the order of restitution does not reflect the restitution amount that was orally imposed and that a special condition of community control was erroneously imposed.1

At sentencing the trial court imposed restitution in the amount of $93.80. However, the order of restitution reflects $104.75. The order must be corrected to reflect the restitution amount orally pronounced.

In the order…