Legal Opinion

Raz v. Mills

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

231 Or. 220 (1962)

372 P.2d 955

RAZ

v.

MILLS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued December 6, 1961.

Reargued February 7, 1962.

Affirmed June 27, 1962.

Francis E. Marsh, McMinnville, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Marsh, Marsh, Dashney & Cushing, McMinnville.

H.H. Phillips, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James K. Buell and Phillips, Coughlin, Buell & Phillips, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is an action for damages suffered in a collision…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Knahtla v. Oregon Short Line, etc., Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API