Amtorg Trading Corporation v. Higgins
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The primary problem raised by these appeals is whether the “sale” of the matches, as that term is defined in the statute, took place in the United States or in Europe. Only if the “sale” took place in the United States is the taxpayer liable for the excise tax. Cf. Indian Motorcycle Co. v. United States, 283 U.S. 570, 51 S.Ct. 601, 75 L.Ed. 1277. The relevant regulations read: “Sale means an agreement whereby the seller transfers the property (that is, the title or substantial incidents of ownership) in goods to the buyer for a consideration called the price, which may…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- A. P. Green Export Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- American Food Products Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.