Legal Opinion

David R. Souza v. Brad Macomber

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 27, 2026No. 1:26-cv-01910Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID R. SOUZA, Case No. 1:26-cv-01910-EPG-HC 8 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO STAY AND STAYING 9 v. PROCEEDINGS 10 BRAD MACOMBER, (ECF No. 2) 11 Respondent. 12 13 Petitioner, represented by counsel, is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ 14 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 15 On March 9, 2026, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and a motion to 16 stay pursuant to Rhines v. Weber,

544 U.S. 269

(2005), because the petition is completely 17 unexhausted.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Alfonso Blake v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Fred Jay Jackson v. Ernest C. Roe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Terry Dixon v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API