Ginn v. Rogers
Illinois Supreme Court
Forcible Entry and Detainer, originally brought by the appellee before a justice of the peace of Jo Daviess county. The case was submitted to a jury, but they could not agree upon a verdict, and the counsel of the parties, by mutual agreement, transferred the case to the Jo Daviess County Court. Á motion was made, on affidavit being filed, to dismiss the suit, which was overruled.
Read the full summary
Forcible Entry and Detainer, originally brought by the appellee before a justice of the peace of Jo Daviess county. The case was submitted to a jury, but they could not agree upon a verdict, and the counsel of the parties, by mutual agreement, transferred the case to the Jo Daviess County Court. Á motion was made, on affidavit being filed, to dismiss the suit, which was overruled. At the November term 1846, the Hon. Hugh T. Dickey presiding, the cause was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict of “guilty55 against the defendants below, upon which verdict the Court rendered a judgment for…
1Opinion of the Court
The Opinion of the Court was delivered by
Purple, J.*
The appellee in this case brought an action of Forcible Entry and Detainer against the appellants, before a justice of the peace of Jo Daviess county. A jury was summoned to try the cause who disagreed and were discharged.
The attorneys who represented the respective parties before the justice, then entered into a written stipulation that the causé should be removed to the County Court, and there tried in the same manner as though a judgment had been rendered by the justice, and an appeal taken therefrom; and, that no objection should be…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Armstrong v. MayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906