Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co. v. Howell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1906Published

Appeal from Johnson District Court.— Hon. O. A. Byington, Judge. Suit on a stock subscription. Judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.

1DissentDeemer, J.

(dissenting).— I am not fully satisfied with the majority opinion in any of its branches. Upon two propositions therein announced, I feel sure the majority is wrong; and, upon the other two, I have not fully satisfied myself, and do not care to make a definite pronouncement thereon without further argument and time for reflection.

The first division, I think, overrules many of our cases, and is founded upon a distinction which does not in fact exist. The case came into the district court by transfer from a justice’s court upon a stipulation by the parties. It was not submitted nor brought into…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Courtright v. DeedsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Dicks v. HatchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  3. Baily v. BirkhoferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. McMeans v. CameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. Smiths v. Dubuque CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API