Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lange v. Lange

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 2003No. COA02-567Published

1DissentCalabria, Judge

I. Mootness

The majority concludes the controversy in this case became moot when Judge Jones retired. I respectfully dissent.

The issue of mootness may arise at any time since “mootness is not determined solely by examining facts in existence at the commencement of the action. If the issues before a court or administrative body become moot at any time during the course of the proceed*314ings, the usual response should be to dismiss the action.” In re Peoples, 296 N.C. 109, 147, 250 S.E.2d 890, 912 (1978). Our Supreme Court explained the mootness doctrine:

[t]hat a court will not decide a ‘moot’ case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. McClendon v. ClinardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API