Legal Opinion

People v. Doyle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 2011PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal. The waiver forecloses defendant’s claim that he was deprived of the right to retain counsel of his own choosing (see People v Whitfield, 52 AD3d 748 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 858 [2008]). That claim does not go to the voluntariness of defendant’s plea (cf. People v Parilla, 8 NY3d 654, 660 [2007]). Defendant’s claim that the court’s denial of a further adjournment for the purpose of raising funds to hire private counsel “precipitated” his plea and appeal waiver is conclusory and unsupported by the record.

As an alternative holding, we find…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ArroyaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. ParillaNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. WhitfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. People v. ZolnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. McBrideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. OramaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. People v. RohadfoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API