Grout v. Kendall
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The ground of plaintiff’s prayer for relief is predicated upon the alleged unconstitutionality of the act in question. The act is too lengthy to be incorporated herein. Sufficient to say that it consists of fourteen sec-tions, and was passed in due form by the leg'is-lature, and was duly approved by the executive Qn March 23, 1921, and duly ratified by vote of the electors, as provided by Section 13 thereof,.at the general election held November 7, 1922. It provided an additional compensation of 50 cents per day of active service for every person who, being a resident of the state of Iowa,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Town of Guilford v. . the Supervisors of Chenango CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Metz v. SouleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
3Cited by40 opinions
- Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Green v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Dickinson v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.