Legal Opinion

Gast v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1910No. 622PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Ceo-. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Franldin L. Gast against Alphonse L. King and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, to recover the purchase price of certain stock in a. corporation, upon the ground that the sale was procured by the fraud and deceit .of the defendants. A general demurrer to the petition was sustained by the court below, and, the plaintiff electing to stand on his petition, judgment was rendered against him. To reverse this judgment, this proceeding in error was commenced.

We think the petition states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Foy v. BlackstoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Gilpin v. Netograph MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Paddock v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  5. Smith v. HeideckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. J. Crouch & Son v. HuberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. WalesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Kunkel v. RattraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Huster v. Newkirk Creamery & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API