Smith v. Federal Express Corp. Long Term Disability Plan

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [21] AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22]

ARTHUR J. TARNOW, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [21], and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [22]. Plaintiffs Complaint [1] seeks action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) to recover full benefits and a remedy for breach of fiduciary duty. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [21] claims Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) has been misjoined and…