Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Company v. Stansbury

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1966No. A-11477PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

George Stansbury and wife leased their lands to Shell Oil Company for oil, gas and other minerals. The lease expressly imposed a duty upon shell to drill an offset well in the event a draining well was located within a specified distance of the Stansbury property lines. Shell also owned an oil and gas lease upon adjacent lands leased by Bill Daniel. It drilled some producing wells upon the Daniel tract which substantially drained oil and gas from the Stansbury lands. The wells on the Daniel tract were located beyond the offset distance specified in the Stansbury lease. The Court of Civil…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hutchins v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ridge Oil Co., Inc. v. Guinn Investments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Bowden v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Texas Oil & Gas Corporation v. VelaTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Browning Oil Co., Inc. v. Luecke, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API