Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 15, 1995No. Nos. 267-89T, 274-89T, 343-89T, 482-89T, 90-508T and 91-1017TPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARKINS, Senior Judge.

Plaintiffs in these six consolidated cases seek refunds of income taxes. Their income tax reports claimed depreciation deductions, investment tax credits, and energy tax credits, from investments in programs that involved so-called leveraged leasing of solar energy equipment. The depreciation deductions and tax credits were disallowed, the additional assessments have been paid, and the claims for refunds have been denied.

The complaints identified 161 individuals in a numbered list of 87 plaintiffs, 74 of which involved joint returns filed by husband and wife and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Free-Pacheco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Leblanc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Sheldon and Anita Drobny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API