Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gitlitz v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 2001No. 99-1295Published

1DissentJustice Breyer

I agree with the majority’s reasoning with the exception of footnotes 6 and 10. The basic statutory provision before us is 26 U. S. C. § 108 — the provision that excludes from the “gross income” of any “insolvent” taxpayer, income that cancellation of a debt (COD) would otherwise generate. As the majority acknowledges, however, ante, at 214-215, n. 6, § 108 contains a subsection that sets forth a special exception. The exception, entitled “Special rules for S corporation,” says:

*221“(A) Certain provisions to be applied at corporate level.
“In the case of an S corporation, subsections (a), (b),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Hort v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API