Legal Opinion

State v. Von Thiele

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 29, 1987No. 8637-9-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peakson, J. *

In Washington, wildlife represents a tremendous ecological, recreational, aesthetic, and economic value to the citizens of the state. The preservation and perpetuation of wildlife is dependent upon effective wildlife management, including the administration and enforcement of wildlife laws, and judicial application of such legislation. This case presents a unique opportunity for this court to promote wildlife law enforcement through judicial application of wildlife legislation.

The primary issue in this case is whether former RCW 77.21.070(1), which requires a person convicted of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Haddenham v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WilburWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Department of Natural Resources v. MarrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. West v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. EssexCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API