Legal Opinion
Weiner v. Internal Revenue Service-Collections Division
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 30, 1992No. 89 Civ. 0959(JES)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss the above-captioned action on various grounds. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, pro se, brings this action against the Collection Division of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and various IRS employees, alleging that the defendants placed an improper levy on her bank account and retirement income as a result of her failure to pay a 1981 tax deficiency. 1 At Oral Argument on September 19, 1991, the Court ruled on the record that even assuming plaintiff were to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Abrams (Donald H.) v. Feinblatt (Eugene M.)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Flippo v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Eric E. Chandler and Peggy K. Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Chandler v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leona Weiner v. Internal Revenue Service, Donald Sommerset and John Doe, Irs Collection AgentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Fedele v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Aloe Vera of America, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000
- Bernholz v. IRSCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Lewis v. RettigDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023