Legal Opinion

Bernholz v. IRS

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 20, 2020No. 19-3379-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-3379-cv Bernholz v. IRS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Carter v. HealthPort Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API