State v. Pardo
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
Marcos Pardo, Jr., was convicted of two counts of aggravated battery by use of a deadly weapon. He was sentenced to the Board of Correction for an indeterminate period not to exceed fifteen years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Applying I.C. § 19-2520, the district judge enhanced Pardo’s sentences by one separate five-year term made to run consecutive to the battery sentences. Pardo presents two issues on appeal: (1) did the district court err in refusing to dismiss part II of the information seeking the enhancement penalty, and (2) were the sentences…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MedinaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. SwensonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Medina v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999