Legal Opinion

State v. Pardo

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1985No. 15652PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Marcos Pardo, Jr., was convicted of two counts of aggravated battery by use of a deadly weapon. He was sentenced to the Board of Correction for an indeterminate period not to exceed fifteen years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Applying I.C. § 19-2520, the district judge enhanced Pardo’s sentences by one separate five-year term made to run consecutive to the battery sentences. Pardo presents two issues on appeal: (1) did the district court err in refusing to dismiss part II of the information seeking the enhancement penalty, and (2) were the sentences…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MedinaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. SwensonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Medina v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API