Legal Opinion
State v. Eakes
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1973No. File 11061PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINANS, Justice.
The defendant in this case was charged with and found guilty by the municipal court of Sioux Falls, South Dakota of possession with intent to exhibit obscene matter, contrary to SDCL 22-24-12. To understand the rather numerous assignments of error made by the defendant in his appeal it is necessary to set forth with some detail the factual situation.
On August 10, 1971, two Sioux Falls police officers, Edgar Flowers and Max Madsen, while wearing plain clothes, purchased tickets to view two films, “Danish Pastry” and “Obscene Plot”, at the Studio I Theater. These officers had…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. EakesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. EakesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993