Legal Opinion
In Re Bullock
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 11, 1952No. Miscellaneous 8-52PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKLAND, Judge.
The Commissioners of the District of Columbia, through the Corporation Counsel, filed a petition seeking to have the minutes of the Grand Jury made available, in order to determine if dereliction of duty on the part of Inspector Albert I. Bullock existed as a policeman and as one of the supervisory officials of the Metropolitan Police Department.
The respondent refused voluntarily to have the minutes of the Grand Jury opened and in his answer in general he raised in substance the following three contentions :
1. That the designation of an advisory board of three members of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. American Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
- United States v. AlperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Ludolph v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Investigation v. CrainNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In the Matter of Applications for Orders Directing the Review or Release of Certain Grand Jury Testimony of Mario BiaggiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- In Re Special February 1971 Grand Jury, Howard Jachimowski v. James B. Conlisk, Jr., Superintendent of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. John AluCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- In Re Report & Recommendation of June 5, 1972 Grand Jury Concerning Transmission of Evidence to the House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.