Legal Opinion

Eberhard v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Callahan; J.

I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is a constitutional officer within the provisions of section 9 of article 10 of the State Constitution. The remaining question is whether the fixation of salary by the board of estimate for plaintiff’s position in the budget for 1934 (which was adopted before plaintiff’s election) controls the amount to which the constitutional protection applies. This entails inquiry into the scope of the Laws of 1932 (Ex. Sess.), chapter 637. By express exception contained in section 2 said act did not apply to the salaries or compensation of any “ officer,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olmsted v. . MeahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Finn v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Liquifin Aktiengesellschaft v. BrennanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Bergerman v. GerosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  4. Finn v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Finn v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API