Legal Opinion

Muller v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 25, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by defendants from an order denying their motion to vacate and dismiss a certiorari order herein on the ground of insufficiency, and on the further ground that the sole remedy to review decisions of the Zoning Board of the Town of Ramapo is provided' for in article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. Respondents’ motion renewed by permission on the argument of the appeal, is granted, without costs, and the appeal is dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Special Term correctly decided that the remedies provided for under section 267 of the Town Law had not been impliedly repealed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Newbrand v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. People Ex Rel. Hudson-Harlem Valley Title & Mortgage Co. v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Fammler v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. North American Holding Corp. v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Lake Mahopac Heights, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Kohnberg v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  4. Little v. RichterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
  5. Theodore Gompers, Inc. v. CraftNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API