Legal Opinion

Piper v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1999No. 97-11-38420; CA A103798PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiff initiated this personal injury action for damages resulting from a motor vehicle collision with a steer that had wandered onto the highway in an open range area. Plaintiff named as defendants both the owners of the steer, Warren and Jacqueline Scott, and the State of Oregon. He alleged that the Scotts were negligent in permitting their steer to wander onto the highway and that the state was negligent in failing to warn drivers that livestock might do so. The trial court granted the Scotts’ motion to dismiss the claim against them. It also granted the state’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Little v. WimmerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kendall v. CURLOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Turrini v. GulickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynch v. RomanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Galligher v. Meadow Acres Angus Ranch, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Galligher v. Meadow Acres Angus Ranch, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API