Legal Opinion

Turrini v. Gulick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 1974PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Plaintiff brought an action to recover for injuries sustained while riding as a passenger in an automobile which collided with a cow owned by defendant Gulick. The collision occurred on State Highway 58 in Klamath County in an area legally designated ‘open range.’ ORS ch 607.

The trial court sustained demurrers by both defendants. Plaintiff refused to plead further. He appeals from judgments entered for defendants. ■ -

The issues presented are: (1) Does the owner of livestock permitted to roam at large on ‘open range’ (OES ch 607) owe a duty to a motorist to prevent his livestock from wandering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Musgrave Et Ux. v. Lucas Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kendall v. CURLOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Weaver v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Daugherty v. Oregon State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. DicksonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Jones v. Chehalem Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Mayse v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Patton v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Watkins v. ChirrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API