Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Esparza-Treto

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 2011No. 08CA2101Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge TAUBMAN

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I. Introduction

The majority affirms the conviction of defendant, Ezequiel Esparza-Treto (Esparza), for first degree assault with extreme indifference, but concludes there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions for one count of second degree reckless assault and one count of third degree assault. However, all three assault convictions were based on Esparza's collision with another vehicle, which caused serious bodily injury to both Esparza's passenger and the driver of the other vehicle, and even though the language of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. SprouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Qureshi v. District Court Ex Rel. Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. People v. McIntierColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. GloverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API