Legal Opinion
The Clausen Company v. Dynatron/bondo Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 22, 1989No. 89-5138PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Chief Judge:
This matter is before us by virtue of a notice of appeal which conveys the impression, correctly as it turns out, that we are about to enter a procedural and jurisdictional maze. The notice of appeal filed on February 24, 1989 reads:
[[Image here]]
[[Image here]]
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is hereby given that Dynatron/Bondo Corporation, party to the above-named action(s), hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from the Order of the Honorable John W. Bissell, U.S.D.J., dated January 25,1989 and entered on the docket on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Rosemary BROWN, Debtor. FIRST JERSEY NATIONAL BANK v. Rosemary BROWN, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Harris Chernin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Walter Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Pure Distributors, Inc. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Strasburger Enterprises, Inc. v. TDGT Limited Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.