Legal Opinion

Rosengarten v. Knapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the appeal of the petitioner, order, in so far as it denies motion for peremptory mandamus, unanimously affirmed, without costs. On the appeal of Knapp, as director, etc., from so much of the order as grants an alternative man*744damus, the order is reversed on the law and the facts and alternative mandamus denied, without costs. There is no basis for a trial of the so-called issues presented by the petition and the answering affidavit. The charges upon which the removal was based are substantial (People ex rel. Rudd v. Cropsey, 173 App. Div. 714; affd., sub nom. People ex rel. Rudd v. Lewis,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Matter of McGuire v. the Mun. Civil Serv. Comm., N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. People ex rel. Lawson v. ColerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. In re McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Dunphy v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whalen v. CorsiNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kelly v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Jerum v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API