Legal Opinion

Camden Fire Ins. v. Altus Farmers Co-Operative Gin Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1925No. 15199Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiff in error was defendant below, and the defendant in .error was plaintiff. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff commenced its action in the county court of Jackson county, on the 19th of April, 1922, by filing two separate petitions against the defendant, for separate losses by fire, both actions being based upon . a fire policy issued by defendant to the plaintiff. The causes were numbered in the trial court as 610 and 611. In case No. 610, it is alleged that the defendant, by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Egan v. British & Foreign Marine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Peninsular & O. S. S. Co. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Simon v. Queen Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. DickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API