Legal Opinion

Elinor R. Bacon v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 15, 1985No. Appeal 84-1598PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or board) in Case No. DC03518310188 upholding the reduction-in-force (RIF) by the Department of Housing and Urban Development effected in late 1982. 20 M.S.P.R. 408. We affirm.

Background

Petitioners are 54 individuals affected by the 1982 RIF in the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD or agency). The agency issued a general RIF notice on August 20, 1982, informing employees that “To resolve workload and skills imbalances, the Department has decided to conduct a Reduction-in-Force…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Western Electric Company, Incorporated v. Piezo Technology, Inc. v. Donald Quigg, Assistant Secretary and Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Paul D. Gandola and Noble F. Jones v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. NEC Corp. v. U.S. Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. Rudolph Buriani v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API