State v. . Raynor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
CRIMINAR action for seduction, tried before Long, J., and a jury, at January Term, 1907, of tbe Superior Court of Pende» County. From judgment of conviction defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
"Walker, J.
The defendant was indicted and convicted of seduction under promise of marriage (Eevisal, sec. 3354), and appealed.
He assigns four errors, as follows:
1. The Court erred in permitting the prosecutrix to .answer the question asked by the Solicitor, to-wit, “Why did you yield to the defendant and have intercourse with him that night?” The witness had previously stated that they had sexual intercourse at the time mentioned. She answered: “I could not help it; he kept right on at me; I told him he was trying to fool me into it; he said he was not; that he was going to marry me.” The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. . LawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- State v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. Whitley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. Ring.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. . BrackettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . MaloneeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- People v. WeinstockNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1912
- State v. HolterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.