Legal Opinion

Secor v. Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw R.

United States Circuit Court

Decided January 9, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On the Intervening Petition of John Eawls.

1Opinion of the CourtDrummond, C. J.

The property of the railroad was sold under a decree of the court. Certain funds were paid into court, and upon the reorganization of the company by the purchasers under the sale a bond was filed in court for the purpose of meeting all claims which might be sustained by the court while the property was in the possession of, and operated by, the receiver under its order. This is a petition asking compensation for an injury which the petitioner sustained in consequence of a fall while attempting to get off the train when it was operated by the receiver. On the fifth day of March, 1878, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. StrattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. SlattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. West Virginia & P. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Murray v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Illinois Cent. R. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1906
  5. Coyle v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API