Legal Opinion
Kuiper v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1983No. 82-224Published
1Opinion of the Court
673 P.2d 1208 (1983)
Dennis KUIPER, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
The GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, et al., Defendant and Appellant.
No. 82-224.
Supreme Court of Montana.
Submitted May 12, 1983.
Decided November 25, 1983.
Rehearing Denied January 19, 1984.
Dzivi, Conklin & Nybo, William Conklin, argued, Great Falls, John C. Noonan, argued, Kansas City, Mo., Kenneth R. Betzler, Akron, Ohio, for defendant and appellant.
Conner, Baiz & Olson, Dennis P. Conner, argued, Great Falls, Niewald, Risjord & Waldeck, John C. Risjord, argued, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff and respondent.
HARRISON, Justice.
Plaintif…
Also in this document: Dissent · Morrison; Dissent · Sheehy; Dissent · Shea.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
- Brown v. North American Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.