Legal Opinion
New York & C. Mail S. S. Co. v. The Express
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Admiralty. Collision; tug and tow participating.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
In the former decision of the above causes, the Express was held without fault, (44 Fed. Rep. 392,) and the tugs Starbuck and Charm, which had the Niagara in tow, were held to blame. It did not seem necessary at that time to determine whether the Niagara, which was in tow of those tugs, and came in collision with the Express, should also be held to blame; but, it appearing that there is no community of interest between the tugs and the Niagara, and that the value of the tugs is insufficient to pay the damage caused to the two vessels by the collision, it is necessary to determine the question…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- The" Virginia Ehrman" and The" Agnese"Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cushing v. Owners of the Ship John FraserSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- The Maria MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Eugene F. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Atlas S. S. Co. v. The ChicagoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1896
- The CromwellDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1917