Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mallory

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from the order entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, which granted relief in the form of a new trial to Appellees, Ricky Mallory, Braheem Lewis and Hakim Lewis, on their claims brought under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). 1 The Commonwealth asks us to determine whether the PCRA court should have rejected Appellees’ ineffective assistance of counsel claims because Appellees failed to demonstrate that there was a reasonable probability that the outcome of their trial would have been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. PoplawskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. MallorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. BathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Com. v. Burton, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Gillis, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API